Paperless Parotograph in Evaluation of Labour

Overview

Using Paperless partograph management of labour as simple tool to prevent obstructed labour or prolonged labour or its complications at the mother or her fetus

Full Title of Study: “Paperless Partograph Evaluation of Labour”

Study Type

  • Study Type: Observational
  • Study Design
    • Time Perspective: Prospective
  • Study Primary Completion Date: September 12, 2017

Detailed Description

WHO PARTOGRAPH is very work load need more time and more stuff in both treaning and learning for plotting and for drowning but inside labour room needing simple partograph playing the simple partograph beast role in management of labour and stand test against time for saving live of labour women and her child Paperless parotograph can help obestitricianes to talk decision about when to transferr the labourus women to higher centers on to make medical intervention or what time to end labour by caesarian section

Clinical Trial Outcome Measures

Primary Measures

  • Progress of labour
    • Time Frame: up to 5 months
    • Cervical dilatation 1 cm / hour

Secondary Measures

  • Charcteristics of new_born
    • Time Frame: up to 1 month
    • Apgar score at1minute and Apgar score at 5minutes
  • Time taken after ALERT EDT
    • Time Frame: up to 2 months
    • Primgravida and Multipara

Participating in This Clinical Trial

Inclusion Criteria

  • women ln active phase of labour – With single pregnanncy – living fetus – cephalic presentation – occipt anterior – 36 weak gestional age up to full term Exclusion Criteria:

  • preterm . .or women with antipartum hemorrhage . – or multipregnanncy – previous utrine surgery – or abnormal cardiotocograph(CTG )PATTERN – or any heart disease of mother or his fetus

Gender Eligibility: Female

Women ln active phase of labour cerivical dilution 4cm or more

Minimum Age: 20 Years

Maximum Age: 42 Years

Are Healthy Volunteers Accepted: Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Investigator Details

  • Lead Sponsor
    • Assiut University
  • Provider of Information About this Clinical Study
    • Principal Investigator: ayman darder, principal investigator – Assiut University
  • Overall Official(s)
    • mohamed khalaph, Study Director, assiut universty faculity of medicine
    • ahmad abass, Study Chair, assiut university faclity of meficibe
  • Overall Contact(s)
    • abobaker khalil, 00201003568474, kotbnetw@hotmail.com

Citations Reporting on Results

Fatehi F, Gray LC, Wootton R. How to improve your PubMed/MEDLINE searches: 3. advanced searching, MeSH and My NCBI. J Telemed Telecare. 2014 Mar;20(2):102-12. doi: 10.1177/1357633X13519036.

Jadad AR, McQuay HJ. Searching the literature. Be systematic in your searching. BMJ. 1993 Jul 3;307(6895):66. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6895.66-a. No abstract available.

Chang AA, Heskett KM, Davidson TM. Searching the literature using medical subject headings versus text word with PubMed. Laryngoscope. 2006 Feb;116(2):336-40. doi: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000195371.72887.a2.

Clinical trials entries are delivered from the US National Institutes of Health and are not reviewed separately by this site. Please see the identifier information above for retrieving further details from the government database.

At TrialBulletin.com, we keep tabs on over 200,000 clinical trials in the US and abroad, using medical data supplied directly by the US National Institutes of Health. Please see the About and Contact page for details.